Posts Tagged "ghusl"

Do braces prevent the validity of ghusl

Posted by on Dec 30, 2011 in Featured, Taharah | 2 comments

Question:

Asslamu alaikum, recently I have put dental braces on my teeth with clips glued to my teeth. Is my obligatory ghusl valid with this?

Answer:

Wa alaykum salam wa rahmatuLlahi wa barakatuHu,

A valid ritual bath [ghusl] is: 1) the intention and 2) bathing the entire [outer] body. Washing the mouth is not obligatory. (Mughni al-Muhtaj v. 1, p. 219; Nihayat al-Muhtaj v. 1, p. 225) Therefore, wearing braces would not affect the validity of one’s ghusl.

And Allah knows best.

Shafiifiqh.com Fatwa Dept.

Read More

A Man Washing His Wife's Deceased Body for Janazah

Posted by on Oct 28, 2011 in Featured, Jana'iz and Janazah, Taharah | 2 comments

Question:

Assalamu Alikum Sheikh,

If husband is Ghair Mahram [i.e. here a marriageable mahram] to his wife how can the husband perform the ritual bath (ghusl) to his dead wife, will it not nullify the wudhu of the deceased wife?

Jazakallah

From: Columbo, Sri Lanka

Answer:

Wa’alaykum Salam wa Rahmatullah,

It is permissible for a husband to perform the ghusl/bath of his dead wife. [Nihayat Al-Muhtaj ila Sharhil Minhaj Vol. 2 page 449 of Shams-ud-din Muhammad ibn Abil - 'Abbas, also Al-Majmu' of Imam An-Nawawi Vol 6 page 200, and elsewhere.]

Regarding the wudu’ of the deceased wife, then it will not be nullified, and therefore it will remain valid. [Rawdat At Talibin Vol. 2 page 102 of An-Nawawi].

Allah Knows Best!

Shafi’i Fiqh Fatwa Dept.

Read More

Does Wearing a Condom Prevent the Obligation of Ghusl?

Posted by on Feb 25, 2010 in Featured, Taharah | 4 comments

Question

As-Salamu ‘alaykum. I have come across a variety of verdicts from Hanafis and Hanbalis regarding whether ‘sexual  intercourse’ using a condom requires ghusl (that is if stopped before ejaculation). The issue seems to revolve around the question of whether the condom acts as a barrier preventing full intercourse. I wanted to know what the Shafi’i stance on this issue is.


Answer:

It is common belief that the condom is a creation of the 19th century. This belief is somewhat inaccurate. In his treatise on syphilis (a sexually transmitted disease), the 16th century Italian anatomist, Falloppio, provides the earliest description of condom use. Wikipedia has his description as:

… linen sheaths soaked in a chemical solution and allowed to dry before use. The cloths he described were sized to cover the glans of the penis, and were held on with a ribbon.

With the usage of fabric condoms as early as the 16th century, it was thus not strange to find our jurists discussing whether or not gusl will be required for one who wraps his genitals in a cloth before insertion. Imam Nawawi in as early as the 13th century discusses the issue in his monumental work Rawdah at-Talibin. After mentioning the divergent opinions of the Ashab he states that the preponderant view is that gusl will become compulsory. Accordingly, ibn Hajar, 3 centuries later, writes in his Tuhfah:

… أو الذكر عليه خرقة كثيفة، بل ولو كان في قصبة

[Ghusl becomes compulsory when the head of the penis enters the vagina of a lady] even if the penis is covered in a thick cloth. In fact [Gusl will also be compulsory] even if the penis is covered in a pipe (qasbah).

In conclusion, the Shafi‘ī position vis-á-vis intercourse with condoms is that gusl will become compulsory.

And Allah knows best

Fatwa by Shaykh Abdurrahman Khan

for Shafiifiqh.com

Read More